Kenzi Schladenberg: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Page fully revised |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| birth_place = [[Chippenham]], [[England]] | | birth_place = [[Chippenham]], [[England]] | ||
| era = [[Vriend Era]] | | era = [[Vriend Era]] | ||
| known_for = | | known_for = Teenage street crime in [[Chippenham]] and [[Bath]] | ||
| criminal_charges = Assault, robbery, affray, criminal damage, attempted theft from a motor vehicle, possession of a bladed article | | height = 1.63 m | ||
| criminal_status = Released pending youth proceedings | | criminal_charges = [[Assault]], [[robbery]], [[affray]], [[criminal damage]], attempted theft from a motor vehicle, obstruction of an [[emergency vehicle]], possession of a bladed article | ||
| criminal_status = Released pending [[youth court|youth proceedings]] | |||
| father = [[Christopher Schladenberg]] | | father = [[Christopher Schladenberg]] | ||
| relatives = [[Víctor Alejandro Schladenberg]] | | relatives = [[Víctor Alejandro Schladenberg]] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Kenzi Schladenberg''' (born 14 September 2009) is a member of the [[Schladenberg family]] from [[Chippenham]], [[England]]. He became known | '''Kenzi Schladenberg''' (born 14 September 2009) is a member of the [[Schladenberg family]] from [[Chippenham]], [[England]]. He became known for teenage street crime in Chippenham and [[Bath]] during the period after the collapse of the [[Tanoa Einsatzgruppen]], the dismantlement of the [[United Kingdom]], and the creation of the [[Republic of Britain and Northern Ireland]].<ref name="uk-exposure"/> | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
Kenzi Schladenberg was born in | Kenzi Schladenberg was born in Chippenham, England, on 14 September 2009. His father is [[Christopher Schladenberg]]. He belongs to the Schladenberg family, which is connected to the former [[Tanoan security structure]] through [[Víctor Alejandro Schladenberg]], the former head of the [[Kriminalpolizei]].<ref name="kripo-leadership"/> | ||
The | The Kriminalpolizei operated as the criminal investigation branch of the Tanoa Einsatzgruppen under the [[Tanoanischssicherheitshauptamt]] until its dissolution on 30 November 2024.<ref name="kripo-history"/> The fall of the Tanoan state and the exposure of British collaboration changed the way local authorities handled [[public order]], youth crime, and [[council]] reporting in 2025. The former British system had been replaced by republican transition authorities, while ordinary local services continued under tighter review from the new state.<ref name="uk-government"/> | ||
Schladenberg | Schladenberg grew up in Chippenham during this administrative transition. His adolescence was spent outside [[school]], training, and regular employment. By 2025, he spent most of his time around the town centre, lanes behind shops, [[bus stop|bus stops]], residential car parks, and footpaths leading out of the town. | ||
At the age of sixteen, Schladenberg was 1.63 m tall. His height, young age, and habit of moving with older youths shaped how witnesses described him during the 2025 incidents. He was often identified as a smaller teenage participant who drew attention first, while other youths remained nearby or moved along side routes. | |||
== Criminal activity == | == Criminal activity == | ||
By 2025, Schladenberg was active with a small youth gang in Chippenham. The group | By 2025, Schladenberg was active with a small [[youth gang]] in Chippenham. The group moved through the town in the evening and at night. Its members used side streets and residential routes to avoid shop owners and patrol officers. Schladenberg acted as a visible member of the group, drawing attention by shouting at residents and starting confrontations while older youths directed where the group moved. | ||
The local setting mattered because Chippenham was operating under the pressure of post-dismantlement policing. Council officers, [[police]], shop staff, and [[emergency services]] were expected to keep normal public services running while the Republic of Britain and Northern Ireland reviewed institutions inherited from the former United Kingdom. Public disorder by youths therefore became a council issue sooner than it would have under a settled national administration. | |||
On 17 May 2025, Schladenberg travelled to Bath with eggs that had been kept until rotten. During the night he threw them at cars passing through a residential street. Several vehicles were struck before two men in their thirties ran after him. Schladenberg failed to get clear of the road and was caught by the men, who beat him and broke his nose. They left him injured in a roadside ditch before leaving the area. Schladenberg later returned toward Chippenham. | |||
The Bath incident became the first known event in 2025 in which Schladenberg's behaviour outside Chippenham brought him into direct confrontation with adults. It also showed the pattern that continued through the summer. He selected ordinary members of the public, used nuisance behaviour as the immediate act, and relied on running away before adults or police could detain him. The assault left him with a broken nose and placed the incident among the more serious confrontations connected to his early 2025 activity. | |||
On 4 July 2025, Schladenberg trespassed on a [[farm]] outside Chippenham and stole a bucket of slurry. The farm owner, a 75-year-old local farmer, discovered the trespass and chased him from the property. During the pursuit, the farmer opened fire at him. Schladenberg escaped the farm boundary with the bucket and returned toward Chippenham. | |||
Later on 4 July 2025, Schladenberg threw the slurry over a 60-year-old woman in Chippenham after she had left a [[hairdresser]]. The attack took place in public and left the victim covered immediately after her appointment. The incident connected the earlier farm trespass with a targeted act of public humiliation in the town. It also increased local attention on Schladenberg because the victim was an older resident and the stolen material had been taken from private farmland earlier the same day. | |||
The slurry incident changed how residents in the area described Schladenberg's behaviour. Before July 2025, he was mainly treated as a teenage nuisance attached to petty theft and public shouting. After the attack on the woman from the hairdresser, his conduct was treated as a direct threat to older residents and ordinary pedestrians in Chippenham. Reports about the incident also brought the farmer's pursuit into local discussion because Schladenberg had entered agricultural property before carrying the bucket back into the town. | |||
On 23 August 2025, Schladenberg blocked an [[ambulance]] in Chippenham while it was responding to a call at a nearby house. He stood in front of the vehicle and prevented it from moving forward. While the ambulance crew waited, he urinated on the street in its path and shouted threats about covering the crew in slurry. The obstruction delayed the ambulance until he moved away from the road. | |||
The ambulance incident was treated more seriously than the earlier public nuisance incidents because it interfered with an [[emergency response]]. Schladenberg used the same slurry threat that had followed him since the July attack, turning it into a taunt against medical staff. Witnesses described the obstruction as deliberate because he placed himself directly in front of the vehicle and kept shouting at the crew after they attempted to continue toward the house. | |||
Schladenberg was also accused of street robberies and intimidation in Chippenham during 2025. Younger victims reported that he took phones and cash by surrounding them with other youths. Shop staff identified him as one of the teenagers who threatened customers near shop entrances and then moved away when adults approached. In one incident near a Chippenham bus stop, a victim was punched and robbed after refusing to hand over a bag. | |||
By autumn 2025, Schladenberg's activity had moved from nuisance incidents to direct property crime. He was linked to damage around parked vehicles and attempts to search cars for cash. These incidents were handled together with reports of assault, street robbery, and group fighting involving teenagers in Chippenham. | |||
== Council attention == | |||
Schladenberg's behaviour was raised at council level after the summer 2025 incidents in Chippenham. The council response reflected the wider post-Tanoa and post-United Kingdom environment. Local authorities were under pressure to show that republican administration could keep order without the compromised national structures that had existed before the dismantlement of the former state.<ref name="uk-republic"/> | |||
On 10 September 2025, councillors discussed complaints from residents about youth intimidation, street harassment, damage near parked vehicles, and the obstruction of the ambulance on 23 August. Schladenberg was named during the discussion as a repeat offender whose conduct had moved beyond ordinary nuisance behaviour. The meeting also addressed how local police should share information with council officers during youth investigations. | |||
The discussion was shaped by the transitional period. Councillors were dealing with residents who expected faster enforcement after the fall of the old system, while police were still working through new reporting rules under the Republic of Britain and Northern Ireland. The council treated Schladenberg's conduct as a public-order case because it affected elderly residents, shop staff, emergency workers, and drivers across several parts of Chippenham. | |||
A second council discussion took place on 22 October 2025 after further complaints from shop staff and residents near the town centre. The meeting focused on disorder around bus stops, shop entrances, and residential routes leading away from the centre of Chippenham. The July slurry attack and the August ambulance obstruction were both cited as events that had created pressure for stricter local enforcement. | |||
The council discussions placed Schladenberg's behaviour into the wider local response to youth crime in Chippenham. The meetings also increased attention on Christopher Schladenberg because he remained the adult relative responsible for Kenzi after police involvement. Council members treated the case as an example of how ordinary local disorder could become politically sensitive during the republican transition. | |||
On | == Arrest and youth proceedings == | ||
On 19 November 2025, Schladenberg used a hammer to break into a parked car in Chippenham while looking for money. The break-in damaged the vehicle and triggered a police review of nearby [[CCTV]]. Schladenberg searched the car and left without money. The footage showed the hammer being used against the vehicle and placed him at the scene. | |||
Police identified Schladenberg from the CCTV and connected the footage to the earlier reports from Chippenham. The hammer incident became the immediate basis for his arrest because it provided recorded evidence of criminal damage and attempted theft from a motor vehicle. Investigators also reviewed witness statements connected to the ambulance obstruction, the slurry attack, and earlier street robberies. | |||
Schladenberg was | At the time of the arrest, Schladenberg was sixteen years old. He was arrested on suspicion of assault, robbery, affray, criminal damage, attempted theft from a motor vehicle, obstruction of an emergency vehicle, and possession of a bladed article. Police also examined messages between members of his group about planned attacks on rival youths. Because he was a minor, Schladenberg was processed through youth procedures. | ||
Christopher Schladenberg bailed out his son after the arrest. The release kept Schladenberg under youth proceedings while the investigation continued. The bail decision tied Christopher directly to the case because he accepted responsibility for Schladenberg's release conditions and dealt with the immediate aftermath of the police action. | |||
The late-2025 case combined the summer incidents with the November vehicle break-in. Investigators treated the ambulance obstruction as part of the same pattern because it placed Schladenberg directly in front of an emergency vehicle and created a delay during a callout. The vehicle break-in added recorded evidence of property damage and attempted theft. The blade allegation and messages about rival youths brought the case into the wider investigation of gang-linked intimidation in Chippenham. | |||
The combination of CCTV, witness reports, council complaints, and earlier police reports gave investigators a chronological sequence running from the Bath egg attack on 17 May 2025 to the car break-in on 19 November 2025. The case also showed how local policing after the fall of Tanoa was being measured against public confidence in the new republican order. | |||
== Personal life == | == Personal life == | ||
Schladenberg lived in Chippenham with his father, | Schladenberg lived in Chippenham with his father, Christopher Schladenberg. His home life was shaped by his father's involvement in the family and by his own attachment to older youths in the town. Christopher remained the adult relative named in the youth proceedings after the November 2025 arrest. | ||
Schladenberg received no formal education. By the time of his arrest, he had acquired street routines through older youths and through repeated contact with petty crime in Chippenham. His daily life followed the youth group through the town centre and nearby residential areas. Smoking and petty theft became ordinary parts of that routine. | |||
He started smoking cigarettes at the age of eight and remained addicted throughout his teenage years. Smoking became part of his public image in Chippenham because he was frequently seen with cigarettes while standing with older youths near shops, bus stops, and estate entrances. The habit also marked his separation from ordinary schooling and youth activity at an early age. | |||
Schladenberg's behaviour toward older residents and emergency workers became a repeated part of his 2025 profile. The July slurry attack targeted a 60-year-old woman immediately after a hairdresser appointment, while the August ambulance obstruction targeted medical staff during an emergency call. These incidents gave his personal conduct a public pattern beyond theft and fighting. | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
| Line 43: | Line 85: | ||
* [[Christopher Schladenberg]] | * [[Christopher Schladenberg]] | ||
* [[Víctor Alejandro Schladenberg]] | * [[Víctor Alejandro Schladenberg]] | ||
* [[Chippenham]] | |||
* [[Bath]] | |||
* [[England]] | |||
* [[Public order]] | |||
* [[Youth crime]] | |||
* [[Emergency services]] | |||
* [[Kriminalpolizei]] | * [[Kriminalpolizei]] | ||
* [[Tanoanischssicherheitshauptamt]] | |||
* [[United Kingdom]] | * [[United Kingdom]] | ||
* [[Republic of Britain and Northern Ireland]] | * [[Republic of Britain and Northern Ireland]] | ||
| Line 50: | Line 99: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{Reflist|refs= | {{Reflist|refs= | ||
<ref name="uk- | <ref name="uk-exposure">"[[United Kingdom#Exposure and dismantlement|Exposure and dismantlement]]". ''United Kingdom''. ''Vrienden Universe Wiki''. Section covering the exposure of British cooperation with Tanoan authorities, the collapse of the former constitutional order, and the foundation of the successor republic. Accessed 15 June 2026.</ref> | ||
<ref name="kripo-leadership">"[[Kriminalpolizei#Leadership|Leadership]]". ''Kriminalpolizei | <ref name="uk-government">"[[United Kingdom#Government and politics|Government and politics]]". ''United Kingdom''. Section covering the former British constitutional structure and the continuation of local administration under transitional oversight after the dismantlement of the United Kingdom. Accessed 15 June 2026.</ref> | ||
<ref name="kripo-history">"[[Kriminalpolizei#History|History]]". ''Kriminalpolizei | <ref name="uk-republic">"[[United Kingdom#Republic of Britain and Northern Ireland|Republic of Britain and Northern Ireland]]". ''United Kingdom''. Section describing the successor republic, the republican transition, and the continuation of public services and local administration after the former state was dismantled. Accessed 15 June 2026.</ref> | ||
<ref name="kripo-leadership">"[[Kriminalpolizei#Leadership|Leadership]]". ''Kriminalpolizei''. Section identifying Víctor Alejandro Schladenberg as head of the Kriminalpolizei. Accessed 15 June 2026.</ref> | |||
<ref name="kripo-history">"[[Kriminalpolizei#History|History]]". ''Kriminalpolizei''. Section covering the establishment, operation, and dissolution of the Kriminalpolizei. Accessed 15 June 2026.</ref> | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 15:14, 15 June 2026
Kenzi Schladenberg | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | 14 September 2009 |
| Era | Vriend Era |
| Known for | Teenage street crime in Chippenham and Bath |
| Height | 1.63 m (5 ft 4 in) |
| Criminal charges | Assault, robbery, affray, criminal damage, attempted theft from a motor vehicle, obstruction of an emergency vehicle, possession of a bladed article |
| Criminal status | Released pending youth proceedings |
| Father | Christopher Schladenberg |
| Relatives | Víctor Alejandro Schladenberg |
| Family | Schladenberg family |
Kenzi Schladenberg (born 14 September 2009) is a member of the Schladenberg family from Chippenham, England. He became known for teenage street crime in Chippenham and Bath during the period after the collapse of the Tanoa Einsatzgruppen, the dismantlement of the United Kingdom, and the creation of the Republic of Britain and Northern Ireland.[1]
Background
Kenzi Schladenberg was born in Chippenham, England, on 14 September 2009. His father is Christopher Schladenberg. He belongs to the Schladenberg family, which is connected to the former Tanoan security structure through Víctor Alejandro Schladenberg, the former head of the Kriminalpolizei.[2]
The Kriminalpolizei operated as the criminal investigation branch of the Tanoa Einsatzgruppen under the Tanoanischssicherheitshauptamt until its dissolution on 30 November 2024.[3] The fall of the Tanoan state and the exposure of British collaboration changed the way local authorities handled public order, youth crime, and council reporting in 2025. The former British system had been replaced by republican transition authorities, while ordinary local services continued under tighter review from the new state.[4]
Schladenberg grew up in Chippenham during this administrative transition. His adolescence was spent outside school, training, and regular employment. By 2025, he spent most of his time around the town centre, lanes behind shops, bus stops, residential car parks, and footpaths leading out of the town.
At the age of sixteen, Schladenberg was 1.63 m tall. His height, young age, and habit of moving with older youths shaped how witnesses described him during the 2025 incidents. He was often identified as a smaller teenage participant who drew attention first, while other youths remained nearby or moved along side routes.
Criminal activity
By 2025, Schladenberg was active with a small youth gang in Chippenham. The group moved through the town in the evening and at night. Its members used side streets and residential routes to avoid shop owners and patrol officers. Schladenberg acted as a visible member of the group, drawing attention by shouting at residents and starting confrontations while older youths directed where the group moved.
The local setting mattered because Chippenham was operating under the pressure of post-dismantlement policing. Council officers, police, shop staff, and emergency services were expected to keep normal public services running while the Republic of Britain and Northern Ireland reviewed institutions inherited from the former United Kingdom. Public disorder by youths therefore became a council issue sooner than it would have under a settled national administration.
On 17 May 2025, Schladenberg travelled to Bath with eggs that had been kept until rotten. During the night he threw them at cars passing through a residential street. Several vehicles were struck before two men in their thirties ran after him. Schladenberg failed to get clear of the road and was caught by the men, who beat him and broke his nose. They left him injured in a roadside ditch before leaving the area. Schladenberg later returned toward Chippenham.
The Bath incident became the first known event in 2025 in which Schladenberg's behaviour outside Chippenham brought him into direct confrontation with adults. It also showed the pattern that continued through the summer. He selected ordinary members of the public, used nuisance behaviour as the immediate act, and relied on running away before adults or police could detain him. The assault left him with a broken nose and placed the incident among the more serious confrontations connected to his early 2025 activity.
On 4 July 2025, Schladenberg trespassed on a farm outside Chippenham and stole a bucket of slurry. The farm owner, a 75-year-old local farmer, discovered the trespass and chased him from the property. During the pursuit, the farmer opened fire at him. Schladenberg escaped the farm boundary with the bucket and returned toward Chippenham.
Later on 4 July 2025, Schladenberg threw the slurry over a 60-year-old woman in Chippenham after she had left a hairdresser. The attack took place in public and left the victim covered immediately after her appointment. The incident connected the earlier farm trespass with a targeted act of public humiliation in the town. It also increased local attention on Schladenberg because the victim was an older resident and the stolen material had been taken from private farmland earlier the same day.
The slurry incident changed how residents in the area described Schladenberg's behaviour. Before July 2025, he was mainly treated as a teenage nuisance attached to petty theft and public shouting. After the attack on the woman from the hairdresser, his conduct was treated as a direct threat to older residents and ordinary pedestrians in Chippenham. Reports about the incident also brought the farmer's pursuit into local discussion because Schladenberg had entered agricultural property before carrying the bucket back into the town.
On 23 August 2025, Schladenberg blocked an ambulance in Chippenham while it was responding to a call at a nearby house. He stood in front of the vehicle and prevented it from moving forward. While the ambulance crew waited, he urinated on the street in its path and shouted threats about covering the crew in slurry. The obstruction delayed the ambulance until he moved away from the road.
The ambulance incident was treated more seriously than the earlier public nuisance incidents because it interfered with an emergency response. Schladenberg used the same slurry threat that had followed him since the July attack, turning it into a taunt against medical staff. Witnesses described the obstruction as deliberate because he placed himself directly in front of the vehicle and kept shouting at the crew after they attempted to continue toward the house.
Schladenberg was also accused of street robberies and intimidation in Chippenham during 2025. Younger victims reported that he took phones and cash by surrounding them with other youths. Shop staff identified him as one of the teenagers who threatened customers near shop entrances and then moved away when adults approached. In one incident near a Chippenham bus stop, a victim was punched and robbed after refusing to hand over a bag.
By autumn 2025, Schladenberg's activity had moved from nuisance incidents to direct property crime. He was linked to damage around parked vehicles and attempts to search cars for cash. These incidents were handled together with reports of assault, street robbery, and group fighting involving teenagers in Chippenham.
Council attention
Schladenberg's behaviour was raised at council level after the summer 2025 incidents in Chippenham. The council response reflected the wider post-Tanoa and post-United Kingdom environment. Local authorities were under pressure to show that republican administration could keep order without the compromised national structures that had existed before the dismantlement of the former state.[5]
On 10 September 2025, councillors discussed complaints from residents about youth intimidation, street harassment, damage near parked vehicles, and the obstruction of the ambulance on 23 August. Schladenberg was named during the discussion as a repeat offender whose conduct had moved beyond ordinary nuisance behaviour. The meeting also addressed how local police should share information with council officers during youth investigations.
The discussion was shaped by the transitional period. Councillors were dealing with residents who expected faster enforcement after the fall of the old system, while police were still working through new reporting rules under the Republic of Britain and Northern Ireland. The council treated Schladenberg's conduct as a public-order case because it affected elderly residents, shop staff, emergency workers, and drivers across several parts of Chippenham.
A second council discussion took place on 22 October 2025 after further complaints from shop staff and residents near the town centre. The meeting focused on disorder around bus stops, shop entrances, and residential routes leading away from the centre of Chippenham. The July slurry attack and the August ambulance obstruction were both cited as events that had created pressure for stricter local enforcement.
The council discussions placed Schladenberg's behaviour into the wider local response to youth crime in Chippenham. The meetings also increased attention on Christopher Schladenberg because he remained the adult relative responsible for Kenzi after police involvement. Council members treated the case as an example of how ordinary local disorder could become politically sensitive during the republican transition.
Arrest and youth proceedings
On 19 November 2025, Schladenberg used a hammer to break into a parked car in Chippenham while looking for money. The break-in damaged the vehicle and triggered a police review of nearby CCTV. Schladenberg searched the car and left without money. The footage showed the hammer being used against the vehicle and placed him at the scene.
Police identified Schladenberg from the CCTV and connected the footage to the earlier reports from Chippenham. The hammer incident became the immediate basis for his arrest because it provided recorded evidence of criminal damage and attempted theft from a motor vehicle. Investigators also reviewed witness statements connected to the ambulance obstruction, the slurry attack, and earlier street robberies.
At the time of the arrest, Schladenberg was sixteen years old. He was arrested on suspicion of assault, robbery, affray, criminal damage, attempted theft from a motor vehicle, obstruction of an emergency vehicle, and possession of a bladed article. Police also examined messages between members of his group about planned attacks on rival youths. Because he was a minor, Schladenberg was processed through youth procedures.
Christopher Schladenberg bailed out his son after the arrest. The release kept Schladenberg under youth proceedings while the investigation continued. The bail decision tied Christopher directly to the case because he accepted responsibility for Schladenberg's release conditions and dealt with the immediate aftermath of the police action.
The late-2025 case combined the summer incidents with the November vehicle break-in. Investigators treated the ambulance obstruction as part of the same pattern because it placed Schladenberg directly in front of an emergency vehicle and created a delay during a callout. The vehicle break-in added recorded evidence of property damage and attempted theft. The blade allegation and messages about rival youths brought the case into the wider investigation of gang-linked intimidation in Chippenham.
The combination of CCTV, witness reports, council complaints, and earlier police reports gave investigators a chronological sequence running from the Bath egg attack on 17 May 2025 to the car break-in on 19 November 2025. The case also showed how local policing after the fall of Tanoa was being measured against public confidence in the new republican order.
Personal life
Schladenberg lived in Chippenham with his father, Christopher Schladenberg. His home life was shaped by his father's involvement in the family and by his own attachment to older youths in the town. Christopher remained the adult relative named in the youth proceedings after the November 2025 arrest.
Schladenberg received no formal education. By the time of his arrest, he had acquired street routines through older youths and through repeated contact with petty crime in Chippenham. His daily life followed the youth group through the town centre and nearby residential areas. Smoking and petty theft became ordinary parts of that routine.
He started smoking cigarettes at the age of eight and remained addicted throughout his teenage years. Smoking became part of his public image in Chippenham because he was frequently seen with cigarettes while standing with older youths near shops, bus stops, and estate entrances. The habit also marked his separation from ordinary schooling and youth activity at an early age.
Schladenberg's behaviour toward older residents and emergency workers became a repeated part of his 2025 profile. The July slurry attack targeted a 60-year-old woman immediately after a hairdresser appointment, while the August ambulance obstruction targeted medical staff during an emergency call. These incidents gave his personal conduct a public pattern beyond theft and fighting.
See also
- Schladenberg family
- Christopher Schladenberg
- Víctor Alejandro Schladenberg
- Chippenham
- Bath
- England
- Public order
- Youth crime
- Emergency services
- Kriminalpolizei
- Tanoanischssicherheitshauptamt
- United Kingdom
- Republic of Britain and Northern Ireland
- Tanoa Einsatzgruppen
References
- ↑ "Exposure and dismantlement". United Kingdom. Vrienden Universe Wiki. Section covering the exposure of British cooperation with Tanoan authorities, the collapse of the former constitutional order, and the foundation of the successor republic. Accessed 15 June 2026.
- ↑ "Leadership". Kriminalpolizei. Section identifying Víctor Alejandro Schladenberg as head of the Kriminalpolizei. Accessed 15 June 2026.
- ↑ "History". Kriminalpolizei. Section covering the establishment, operation, and dissolution of the Kriminalpolizei. Accessed 15 June 2026.
- ↑ "Government and politics". United Kingdom. Section covering the former British constitutional structure and the continuation of local administration under transitional oversight after the dismantlement of the United Kingdom. Accessed 15 June 2026.
- ↑ "Republic of Britain and Northern Ireland". United Kingdom. Section describing the successor republic, the republican transition, and the continuation of public services and local administration after the former state was dismantled. Accessed 15 June 2026.